Colourrender (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sarkis; Sarkis v Colourrender (Australia) Pty Ltd

Table of Contents

Case Overview

Case Name: Colourrender (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sarkis; Sarkis v Colourrender (Australia) Pty Ltd
Citation: [2023] NSWCATAP 90
Date of Decision: 29 March 2023
Tribunal/Court Name: Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales

Project Details

Type of Residential Work: Rendering work
Original Contract Price: $35,449.80
Final Project Cost: $76,660.00
Actual Completion: 01 May 2018

Parties Involved

Homeowner Details: George Sarkis and Sonya Sarkis
Builder Details: Colourrender (Australia) Pty Ltd (Company)

Nature of the Dispute

This case revolves around a dispute regarding rendering work completed by Colourrender (Australia) Pty Ltd for the homeowners. The main issues include breaches of the statutory warranties imposed by Section 18B of the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) related to defective rendering work and incomplete tasks.

  • Specific Section 18B Warranties Allegedly Breached: Breach of statutory warranties under Section 18B of the Home Building Act
  • Types of Defects or Incomplete Work Claimed: Defective rendering work, incomplete works

Claim Details

  • Amount Claimed by Homeowner: $76,660.00
  • Specific Remedies Sought: Damages for defective work, costs
  • Counter-Claims by the Builder: None

Key Findings

The tribunal found a breach of Section 18B warranties based on the presented evidence. The decision classified the defects as being due to ineffective and incomplete work by the builder, determining that Colourrender was responsible for the identified defects.

  • Classification of Defects: Defective and incomplete work
  • Determination of Fault: Builder responsible for defects

Outcome

The tribunal’s decision favoured the homeowners, with remedies ordered for the builder to compensate for the defective work. The homeowners were awarded damages amounting to $50,639.60.

  • Financial Award: $50,639.60

Important Considerations

This case emphasised the significance of clear contractual terms and adherence to statutory warranties. The tribunal’s reliance on expert evidence played a crucial role in the outcome, revealing the complexities surrounding defective workmanship.

Key Sections and Interpretation of the Home Building Act and Relevant Case Precedents

This case demonstrates the application of Section 18B of the Home Building Act, focusing on the warranties that builders must adhere to.

Next Steps

For homeowners facing a similar situation, the following steps are advisable:

  • Consult an experienced construction lawyer to evaluate your situation and develop a strategic approach to your dispute.
  • Document all defects and communications with the builder meticulously.
  • Consider an expert inspection to substantiate claims of defective works.

Take Warranty
Wisdom into Action

Use HBApp to apply legal insights 
to your home project

Need Expert Advice on Your Building Dispute?

While our case summaries provide valuable insights, every building dispute is unique.

Get personalised guidance from a qualified professional.

Begin Your Journey to a Dream Home Today

Ready to transform your home building experience? Sign up for a free trial and unlock the full potential of Home Building App. Discover how our comprehensive project management tools can simplify your build, ensuring your project remains on time, within budget, and of the highest quality.